samples: bpf: relax test_maps check
hash map is unordered, so get_next_key() iterator shouldn't
rely on particular order of elements. So relax this test.
Fixes: ffb65f27a1
("bpf: add a testsuite for eBPF maps")
Reported-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8ebe667c41
commit
ba1a68bf13
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -69,9 +69,9 @@ static void test_hashmap_sanity(int i, void *data)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* iterate over two elements */
|
/* iterate over two elements */
|
||||||
assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &key, &next_key) == 0 &&
|
assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &key, &next_key) == 0 &&
|
||||||
next_key == 2);
|
(next_key == 1 || next_key == 2));
|
||||||
assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &next_key, &next_key) == 0 &&
|
assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &next_key, &next_key) == 0 &&
|
||||||
next_key == 1);
|
(next_key == 1 || next_key == 2));
|
||||||
assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &next_key, &next_key) == -1 &&
|
assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &next_key, &next_key) == -1 &&
|
||||||
errno == ENOENT);
|
errno == ENOENT);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue