Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

[SCSI] zfcp: Remove unnecessary warning message

Browse source 
Remove a message that was emitted for a port that could not initially
be opened. This is a rare case when the port discovery hits an
initiator port and only confuses the user with an initator port logged
in the message. Remove the whole special case: The failed "open port"
request triggers required follow-up actions anyway.

Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Felix Beck <felix@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
This commit is contained in:
Christof Schmitt 2008-12-19 16:57:02 +01:00 committed by James Bottomley
parent 39eb7e9aca
commit b632ade282
2 changed files with 1 additions and 7 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c
View file

@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ static const char *zfcp_rec_dbf_ids[] = {
[29] = "link down", [29] = "link down",
[30] = "link up status read", [30] = "link up status read",
[31] = "open port failed", [31] = "open port failed",
[32] = "open port failed", [32] = "",
[33] = "close port", [33] = "close port",
[34] = "open unit failed", [34] = "open unit failed",
[35] = "exclusive open unit failed", [35] = "exclusive open unit failed",

6
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
View file

@ -1423,13 +1423,7 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_open_port_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
switch (header->fsf_status_qual.word[0]) { switch (header->fsf_status_qual.word[0]) {
case FSF_SQ_INVOKE_LINK_TEST_PROCEDURE: case FSF_SQ_INVOKE_LINK_TEST_PROCEDURE:
case FSF_SQ_ULP_DEPENDENT_ERP_REQUIRED: case FSF_SQ_ULP_DEPENDENT_ERP_REQUIRED:
req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
break;
case FSF_SQ_NO_RETRY_POSSIBLE: case FSF_SQ_NO_RETRY_POSSIBLE:
dev_warn(&req->adapter->ccw_device->dev,
"Remote port 0x%016Lx could not be opened\n",
(unsigned long long)port->wwpn);
zfcp_erp_port_failed(port, 32, req);
req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR; req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
break; break;
} }