From b150423e0d5eeca091e0af2eb4594a53df304f9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bastien Nocera Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:20:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] iio: iio-utils: Fix possible incorrect mask calculation [ Upstream commit 208a68c8393d6041a90862992222f3d7943d44d6 ] On some machines, iio-sensor-proxy was returning all 0's for IIO sensor values. It turns out that the bits_used for this sensor is 32, which makes the mask calculation: *mask = (1 << 32) - 1; If the compiler interprets the 1 literals as 32-bit ints, it generates undefined behavior depending on compiler version and optimization level. On my system, it optimizes out the shift, so the mask value becomes *mask = (1) - 1; With a mask value of 0, iio-sensor-proxy will always return 0 for every axis. Avoid incorrect 0 values caused by compiler optimization. See original fix by Brett Dutro in iio-sensor-proxy: https://github.com/hadess/iio-sensor-proxy/commit/9615ceac7c134d838660e209726cd86aa2064fd3 Signed-off-by: Bastien Nocera Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/iio/iio_utils.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/iio/iio_utils.c b/tools/iio/iio_utils.c index 7a6d61c6c012..55272fef3b50 100644 --- a/tools/iio/iio_utils.c +++ b/tools/iio/iio_utils.c @@ -159,9 +159,9 @@ int iioutils_get_type(unsigned *is_signed, unsigned *bytes, unsigned *bits_used, *be = (endianchar == 'b'); *bytes = padint / 8; if (*bits_used == 64) - *mask = ~0; + *mask = ~(0ULL); else - *mask = (1ULL << *bits_used) - 1; + *mask = (1ULL << *bits_used) - 1ULL; *is_signed = (signchar == 's'); if (fclose(sysfsfp)) {