From b108fe6b08f3f61c2c465649b20b7d4b4c185728 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:30:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] nfsd: trivial: use SEEK_SET instead of 0 in vfs_llseek
They're equivalent, but SEEK_SET is more informative...
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
index 568666156ea4..c8bd9c3be7f7 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
@@ -2039,7 +2039,7 @@ nfsd_readdir(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, loff_t *offsetp,
if (err)
goto out;
- offset = vfs_llseek(file, offset, 0);
+ offset = vfs_llseek(file, offset, SEEK_SET);
if (offset < 0) {
err = nfserrno((int)offset);
goto out_close;