rcu: Add debug checks to TREE_PREEMPT_RCU for premature grace periods
Check to make sure that there are no blocked tasks for the previous grace period while initializing for the next grace period, verify that rcu_preempt_qs() is given the correct CPU number and is never called for an offline CPU. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com Cc: niv@us.ibm.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu LKML-Reference: <12528585111986-git-send-email-> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bbe3eae8bb
commit
b0e165c035
2 changed files with 27 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -632,6 +632,7 @@ rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
|
|||
/* Special-case the common single-level case. */
|
||||
if (NUM_RCU_NODES == 1) {
|
||||
rnp->qsmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
|
||||
rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(rnp);
|
||||
rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
|
||||
rsp->signaled = RCU_SIGNAL_INIT; /* force_quiescent_state OK. */
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
|
||||
|
@ -665,6 +666,7 @@ rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
|
|||
for (rnp_cur = &rsp->node[0]; rnp_cur < rnp_end; rnp_cur++) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&rnp_cur->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
|
||||
rnp_cur->qsmask = rnp_cur->qsmaskinit;
|
||||
rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(rnp);
|
||||
rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&rnp_cur->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_qs(int cpu)
|
|||
|
||||
if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting &&
|
||||
(t->rcu_read_unlock_special & RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED) == 0) {
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != smp_processor_id());
|
||||
|
||||
/* Possibly blocking in an RCU read-side critical section. */
|
||||
rdp = rcu_preempt_state.rda[cpu];
|
||||
|
@ -103,7 +104,11 @@ static void rcu_preempt_qs(int cpu)
|
|||
* state for the current grace period), then as long
|
||||
* as that task remains queued, the current grace period
|
||||
* cannot end.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* But first, note that the current CPU must still be
|
||||
* on line!
|
||||
*/
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE((rdp->grpmask & rnp->qsmaskinit) == 0);
|
||||
phase = !(rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask) ^ (rnp->gpnum & 0x1);
|
||||
list_add(&t->rcu_node_entry, &rnp->blocked_tasks[phase]);
|
||||
smp_mb(); /* Ensure later ctxt swtch seen after above. */
|
||||
|
@ -258,6 +263,18 @@ static void rcu_print_task_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
|
|||
|
||||
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check that the list of blocked tasks for the newly completed grace
|
||||
* period is in fact empty. It is a serious bug to complete a grace
|
||||
* period that still has RCU readers blocked! This function must be
|
||||
* invoked -before- updating this rnp's ->gpnum, and the rnp's ->lock
|
||||
* must be held by the caller.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&rnp->blocked_tasks[rnp->gpnum & 0x1]));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check for preempted RCU readers for the specified rcu_node structure.
|
||||
* If the caller needs a reliable answer, it must hold the rcu_node's
|
||||
|
@ -450,6 +467,14 @@ static void rcu_print_task_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
|
|||
|
||||
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Because there is no preemptable RCU, there can be no readers blocked,
|
||||
* so there is no need to check for blocked tasks.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Because preemptable RCU does not exist, there are never any preempted
|
||||
* RCU readers.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue