8139cp: Do not re-enable RX interrupts in cp_tx_timeout()
If an RX interrupt was already received but NAPI has not yet run when the RX timeout happens, we end up in cp_tx_timeout() with RX interrupts already disabled. Blindly re-enabling them will cause an IRQ storm. (This is made particularly horrid by the fact that cp_interrupt() always returns that it's handled the interrupt, even when it hasn't actually done anything. If it didn't do that, the core IRQ code would have detected the storm and handled it, I'd have had a clear smoking gun backtrace instead of just a spontaneously resetting router, and I'd have at *least* two days of my life back. Changing the return value of cp_interrupt() will be argued about under separate cover.) Unconditionally leave RX interrupts disabled after the reset, and schedule NAPI to check the receive ring and re-enable them. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3c6cb3acee
commit
aaa0062ecf
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -1262,9 +1262,10 @@ static void cp_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev)
|
|||
rc = cp_init_rings(cp);
|
||||
cp_start_hw(cp);
|
||||
__cp_set_rx_mode(dev);
|
||||
cp_enable_irq(cp);
|
||||
cpw16_f(IntrMask, cp_norx_intr_mask);
|
||||
|
||||
netif_wake_queue(dev);
|
||||
napi_schedule_irqoff(&cp->napi);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cp->lock, flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue