[ARM] omap: remove unnecessary calls to propagate_rate()
We've always called propagate_rate() in the parent function to the .set_rate methods, so there's no point having the .set_rate methods also call this heavy-weight function - it's mere duplication of what's happening elsewhere. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c6af450852
commit
a9e8820963
1 changed files with 1 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -308,7 +308,6 @@ static int omap1_select_table_rate(struct clk * clk, unsigned long rate)
|
|||
omap_sram_reprogram_clock(ptr->dpllctl_val, ptr->ckctl_val);
|
||||
|
||||
ck_dpll1.rate = ptr->pll_rate;
|
||||
propagate_rate(&ck_dpll1);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -333,9 +332,6 @@ static int omap1_clk_set_rate_dsp_domain(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
|
|||
ret = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(ret == 0 && (clk->flags & RATE_PROPAGATES)))
|
||||
propagate_rate(clk);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -442,8 +438,6 @@ static int omap1_set_sossi_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
|
|||
omap_writel(l, MOD_CONF_CTRL_1);
|
||||
|
||||
clk->rate = p_rate / (div + 1);
|
||||
if (unlikely(clk->flags & RATE_PROPAGATES))
|
||||
propagate_rate(clk);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -787,7 +781,6 @@ int __init omap1_clk_init(void)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
propagate_rate(&ck_dpll1);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
/* Find the highest supported frequency and enable it */
|
||||
if (omap1_select_table_rate(&virtual_ck_mpu, ~0)) {
|
||||
|
@ -796,9 +789,9 @@ int __init omap1_clk_init(void)
|
|||
omap_writew(0x2290, DPLL_CTL);
|
||||
omap_writew(cpu_is_omap730() ? 0x3005 : 0x1005, ARM_CKCTL);
|
||||
ck_dpll1.rate = 60000000;
|
||||
propagate_rate(&ck_dpll1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
propagate_rate(&ck_dpll1);
|
||||
/* Cache rates for clocks connected to ck_ref (not dpll1) */
|
||||
propagate_rate(&ck_ref);
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "Clocking rate (xtal/DPLL1/MPU): "
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue