mmc: card: fixing an false identification of SANITIZE command
Inside the routine mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd() the sanitize command is identified according to the value of bits 16-23 of the argument. but what happens if a different command is sent, and only by chance, bits 16-23 contain the value of SANITIZE command ? In that case a SANITIZE command will be falsely identified. In order to prevent such a case, the condition is expanded and now it also checks the opcode itself, and verifies that it is an MMC_SWITCH opcode. Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4d156d50b5
commit
a82e484e24
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -542,7 +542,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
|
||||||
goto cmd_rel_host;
|
goto cmd_rel_host;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (MMC_EXTRACT_INDEX_FROM_ARG(cmd.arg) == EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START) {
|
if ((MMC_EXTRACT_INDEX_FROM_ARG(cmd.arg) == EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START) &&
|
||||||
|
(cmd.opcode == MMC_SWITCH)) {
|
||||||
err = ioctl_do_sanitize(card);
|
err = ioctl_do_sanitize(card);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (err)
|
if (err)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue