x86, atomic64: In selftest, distinguish x86-64 from 586+
The x86-64 implementation of the atomics is totally different from the i586+ implementation, which makes it quite confusing to call it "586+". Also fix indentation, and add "i" for "i386" and "i586" as used elsewhere in the kernel. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Luca Barbieri <luca@luca-barbieri.com> LKML-Reference: <1267005265-27958-4-git-send-email-luca@luca-barbieri.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f3e8313146
commit
a5c9161f27
1 changed files with 8 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -144,11 +144,13 @@ static __init int test_atomic64(void)
|
|||
BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "atomic64 test passed for %s+ platform %s CX8 and %s SSE\n",
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64
|
||||
"586",
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "atomic64 test passed for %s platform %s CX8 and %s SSE\n",
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
|
||||
"x86-64",
|
||||
#elif defined(CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64)
|
||||
"i586+",
|
||||
#else
|
||||
"386",
|
||||
"i386+",
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX8) ? "with" : "without",
|
||||
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM) ? "with" : "without");
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue