Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Fix up trivial spelling errors ('taht' -> 'that')

Browse source 
Pointed out by Lucas who found the new one in a comment in
setup_percpu.c. And then I fixed the others that I grepped
for.

Reported-by: Lucas <canolucas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds 2010-07-21 09:25:42 -07:00
parent f4b23cc2d5
commit a4ce96ac35
4 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c
View file

@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_node_map, cpu) =
early_per_cpu_map(x86_cpu_to_node_map, cpu);
/*
* Ensure taht the boot cpu numa_node is correct when the boot
* Ensure that the boot cpu numa_node is correct when the boot
* cpu is on a node that doesn't have memory installed.
* Also cpu_up() will call cpu_to_node() for APs when
* MEMORY_HOTPLUG is defined, before per_cpu(numa_node) is set

2
drivers/usb/gadget/f_fs.c
View file

@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ struct ffs_data {
* handling setup requests immidiatelly user space may be so
* slow that another setup will be sent to the gadget but this
* time not to us but another function and then there could be
* a race. Is taht the case? Or maybe we can use cdev->req
* a race. Is that the case? Or maybe we can use cdev->req
* after all, maybe we just need some spinlock for that? */
struct usb_request *ep0req; /* P: mutex */
struct completion ep0req_completion; /* P: mutex */

2
drivers/video/aty/radeon_pm.c
View file

@ -2872,7 +2872,7 @@ void radeonfb_pm_init(struct radeonfb_info *rinfo, int dynclk, int ignore_devlis
}
#if 0
/* Power down TV DAC, taht saves a significant amount of power,
/* Power down TV DAC, that saves a significant amount of power,
* we'll have something better once we actually have some TVOut
* support
*/

2
fs/jffs2/xattr.c
View file

@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ void jffs2_xattr_free_inode(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, struct jffs2_inode_cache *i
static int check_xattr_ref_inode(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, struct jffs2_inode_cache *ic)
{
/* success of check_xattr_ref_inode() means taht inode (ic) dose not have
/* success of check_xattr_ref_inode() means that inode (ic) dose not have
* duplicate name/value pairs. If duplicate name/value pair would be found,
* one will be removed.
*/