writeback: make the super_block pinning more efficient
Currently we pin the inode->i_sb for every single inode. This increases cache traffic on sb->s_umount sem. Lets instead cache the inode sb pin state and keep the super_block pinned for as long as keep writing out inodes from the same super_block. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cf137307cd
commit
9ecc2738ac
1 changed files with 29 additions and 17 deletions
|
@ -540,6 +540,17 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
|
|||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void unpin_sb_for_writeback(struct super_block **psb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct super_block *sb = *psb;
|
||||
|
||||
if (sb) {
|
||||
up_read(&sb->s_umount);
|
||||
put_super(sb);
|
||||
*psb = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For WB_SYNC_NONE writeback, the caller does not have the sb pinned
|
||||
* before calling writeback. So make sure that we do pin it, so it doesn't
|
||||
|
@ -549,10 +560,19 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
|
|||
* 1 if we failed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int pin_sb_for_writeback(struct writeback_control *wbc,
|
||||
struct inode *inode)
|
||||
struct inode *inode, struct super_block **psb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If this sb is already pinned, nothing more to do. If not and
|
||||
* *psb is non-NULL, unpin the old one first
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (sb == *psb)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
else if (*psb)
|
||||
unpin_sb_for_writeback(psb);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Caller must already hold the ref for this
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -566,7 +586,7 @@ static int pin_sb_for_writeback(struct writeback_control *wbc,
|
|||
if (down_read_trylock(&sb->s_umount)) {
|
||||
if (sb->s_root) {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
goto pinned;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* umounted, drop rwsem again and fall through to failure
|
||||
|
@ -577,24 +597,15 @@ static int pin_sb_for_writeback(struct writeback_control *wbc,
|
|||
sb->s_count--;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void unpin_sb_for_writeback(struct writeback_control *wbc,
|
||||
struct inode *inode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
|
||||
|
||||
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
up_read(&sb->s_umount);
|
||||
put_super(sb);
|
||||
pinned:
|
||||
*psb = sb;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void writeback_inodes_wb(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
|
||||
struct writeback_control *wbc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct super_block *sb = wbc->sb;
|
||||
struct super_block *sb = wbc->sb, *pin_sb = NULL;
|
||||
const int is_blkdev_sb = sb_is_blkdev_sb(sb);
|
||||
const unsigned long start = jiffies; /* livelock avoidance */
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -653,7 +664,7 @@ static void writeback_inodes_wb(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
|
|||
if (inode_dirtied_after(inode, start))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
if (pin_sb_for_writeback(wbc, inode)) {
|
||||
if (pin_sb_for_writeback(wbc, inode, &pin_sb)) {
|
||||
requeue_io(inode);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -662,7 +673,6 @@ static void writeback_inodes_wb(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
|
|||
__iget(inode);
|
||||
pages_skipped = wbc->pages_skipped;
|
||||
writeback_single_inode(inode, wbc);
|
||||
unpin_sb_for_writeback(wbc, inode);
|
||||
if (wbc->pages_skipped != pages_skipped) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* writeback is not making progress due to locked
|
||||
|
@ -682,6 +692,8 @@ static void writeback_inodes_wb(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
|
|||
wbc->more_io = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
unpin_sb_for_writeback(&pin_sb);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
|
||||
/* Leave any unwritten inodes on b_io */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue