plist: Fix grammar mistake, and c-style mistake

Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <1263241267-25204-2-git-send-email-jkacur@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
John Kacur 2010-01-11 21:21:06 +01:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 7284ce6c9f
commit 9ca94d7c01

View file

@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
* the insertion of new nodes. There are no nodes with duplicate
* priorites on the list.
*
* The nodes on the node_list is ordered by priority and can contain
* The nodes on the node_list are ordered by priority and can contain
* entries which have the same priority. Those entries are ordered
* FIFO
*
@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static inline int plist_node_empty(const struct plist_node *node)
*
* Assumes the plist is _not_ empty.
*/
static inline struct plist_node* plist_first(const struct plist_head *head)
static inline struct plist_node *plist_first(const struct plist_head *head)
{
return list_entry(head->node_list.next,
struct plist_node, plist.node_list);