plist: Fix grammar mistake, and c-style mistake
Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1263241267-25204-2-git-send-email-jkacur@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7284ce6c9f
commit
9ca94d7c01
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
|
|||
* the insertion of new nodes. There are no nodes with duplicate
|
||||
* priorites on the list.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The nodes on the node_list is ordered by priority and can contain
|
||||
* The nodes on the node_list are ordered by priority and can contain
|
||||
* entries which have the same priority. Those entries are ordered
|
||||
* FIFO
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static inline int plist_node_empty(const struct plist_node *node)
|
|||
*
|
||||
* Assumes the plist is _not_ empty.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline struct plist_node* plist_first(const struct plist_head *head)
|
||||
static inline struct plist_node *plist_first(const struct plist_head *head)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return list_entry(head->node_list.next,
|
||||
struct plist_node, plist.node_list);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue