iommu sg merging: call dma_set_seg_boundary in __scsi_alloc_queue()
This is a one-line patch to add the following to __scsi_alloc_queue(): dma_set_seg_boundary(dev, shost->dma_boundary); This is the simplest approach but the result looks odd, __scsi_alloc_queue() does: blk_queue_segment_boundary(q, shost->dma_boundary); dma_set_seg_boundary(dev, shost->dma_boundary); blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, dma_get_max_seg_size(dev)); I think that it would be better to set up segment boundary in the same way as we did for the maximum segment size. That is, removing shost->dma_boundary and LLDs call pci_set_dma_seg_boundary (or its friends). Then __scsi_alloc_queue() can set up both limits in the same way: blk_queue_segment_boundary(q, dma_get_seg_boundary(dev)); blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, dma_get_max_seg_size(dev)); killing dma_boundary in scsi_host_template needs a large patch for libata (dma_boundary is used by only libata and sym53c8xx). I'll send a patch to do that if it is acceptable. James and Jeff? Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
681cc5cd3e
commit
99c84dbdc7
1 changed files with 1 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -1584,6 +1584,7 @@ struct request_queue *__scsi_alloc_queue(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
|
|||
blk_queue_max_sectors(q, shost->max_sectors);
|
||||
blk_queue_bounce_limit(q, scsi_calculate_bounce_limit(shost));
|
||||
blk_queue_segment_boundary(q, shost->dma_boundary);
|
||||
dma_set_seg_boundary(dev, shost->dma_boundary);
|
||||
|
||||
blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, dma_get_max_seg_size(dev));
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue