ipmi: Remove the now unused priority from SMI sender

Since the queue was moved into the message handler, the priority
field is now irrelevant.

Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
This commit is contained in:
Corey Minyard 2014-11-07 07:57:31 -06:00
parent b874b985c8
commit 99ab32f3b5
3 changed files with 7 additions and 9 deletions

View file

@ -1516,7 +1516,7 @@ static void smi_send(ipmi_smi_t intf, struct ipmi_smi_handlers *handlers,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock, flags);
if (smi_msg)
handlers->sender(intf->send_info, smi_msg, 0);
handlers->sender(intf->send_info, smi_msg);
}
/*
@ -3908,7 +3908,7 @@ static void smi_recv_tasklet(unsigned long val)
if (!run_to_completion)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock, flags);
if (newmsg)
intf->handlers->sender(intf->send_info, newmsg, 0);
intf->handlers->sender(intf->send_info, newmsg);
handle_new_recv_msgs(intf);
}

View file

@ -892,8 +892,7 @@ static void check_start_timer_thread(struct smi_info *smi_info)
}
static void sender(void *send_info,
struct ipmi_smi_msg *msg,
int priority)
struct ipmi_smi_msg *msg)
{
struct smi_info *smi_info = send_info;
enum si_sm_result result;

View file

@ -98,12 +98,11 @@ struct ipmi_smi_handlers {
operation is not allowed to fail. If an error occurs, it
should report back the error in a received message. It may
do this in the current call context, since no write locks
are held when this is run. If the priority is > 0, the
message will go into a high-priority queue and be sent
first. Otherwise, it goes into a normal-priority queue. */
are held when this is run. Message are delivered one at
a time by the message handler, a new message will not be
delivered until the previous message is returned. */
void (*sender)(void *send_info,
struct ipmi_smi_msg *msg,
int priority);
struct ipmi_smi_msg *msg);
/* Called by the upper layer to request that we try to get
events from the BMC we are attached to. */