[PATCH] SUNRPC: don't reencode when looping in call transmit.
If the call to xprt_transmit() fails due to socket buffer space exhaustion, we do not need to re-encode the RPC message when we loop back through call_transmit. Re-encoding can actually end up triggering the WARN_ON() in call_decode() if we re-encode something like a read() request and auth->au_rslack has changed. It can also cause us to increment the RPCSEC_GSS sequence number beyond the limits of the allowed window. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e4d76e1c0b
commit
940e3318c3
1 changed files with 29 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static void call_bind(struct rpc_task *task);
|
|||
static void call_bind_status(struct rpc_task *task);
|
||||
static void call_transmit(struct rpc_task *task);
|
||||
static void call_status(struct rpc_task *task);
|
||||
static void call_transmit_status(struct rpc_task *task);
|
||||
static void call_refresh(struct rpc_task *task);
|
||||
static void call_refreshresult(struct rpc_task *task);
|
||||
static void call_timeout(struct rpc_task *task);
|
||||
|
@ -672,6 +673,18 @@ call_allocate(struct rpc_task *task)
|
|||
rpc_exit(task, -ERESTARTSYS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int
|
||||
rpc_task_need_encode(struct rpc_task *task)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return task->tk_rqstp->rq_snd_buf.len == 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void
|
||||
rpc_task_force_reencode(struct rpc_task *task)
|
||||
{
|
||||
task->tk_rqstp->rq_snd_buf.len = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* 3. Encode arguments of an RPC call
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -867,12 +880,14 @@ call_transmit(struct rpc_task *task)
|
|||
if (task->tk_status != 0)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
/* Encode here so that rpcsec_gss can use correct sequence number. */
|
||||
if (task->tk_rqstp->rq_bytes_sent == 0) {
|
||||
if (rpc_task_need_encode(task)) {
|
||||
task->tk_rqstp->rq_bytes_sent = 0;
|
||||
call_encode(task);
|
||||
/* Did the encode result in an error condition? */
|
||||
if (task->tk_status != 0)
|
||||
goto out_nosend;
|
||||
}
|
||||
task->tk_action = call_transmit_status;
|
||||
xprt_transmit(task);
|
||||
if (task->tk_status < 0)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
@ -884,6 +899,7 @@ call_transmit(struct rpc_task *task)
|
|||
out_nosend:
|
||||
/* release socket write lock before attempting to handle error */
|
||||
xprt_abort_transmit(task);
|
||||
rpc_task_force_reencode(task);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -915,7 +931,6 @@ call_status(struct rpc_task *task)
|
|||
break;
|
||||
case -ECONNREFUSED:
|
||||
case -ENOTCONN:
|
||||
req->rq_bytes_sent = 0;
|
||||
if (clnt->cl_autobind)
|
||||
clnt->cl_port = 0;
|
||||
task->tk_action = call_bind;
|
||||
|
@ -937,7 +952,18 @@ call_status(struct rpc_task *task)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* 6a. Handle RPC timeout
|
||||
* 6a. Handle transmission errors.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void
|
||||
call_transmit_status(struct rpc_task *task)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (task->tk_status != -EAGAIN)
|
||||
rpc_task_force_reencode(task);
|
||||
call_status(task);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* 6b. Handle RPC timeout
|
||||
* We do not release the request slot, so we keep using the
|
||||
* same XID for all retransmits.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue