Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

tracing: Pushdown the bkl tracepoints calls

Browse source 
Currently we are calling the bkl tracepoint callbacks just before the
bkl lock/unlock operations, ie the tracepoint call is not inside a
lock_kernel() function but inside a lock_kernel() macro. Hence the
bkl trace event header must be included from smp_lock.h. This raises
some nasty circular header dependencies:

linux/smp_lock.h -> trace/events/bkl.h -> trace/define_trace.h
-> trace/ftrace.h -> linux/ftrace_event.h -> linux/hardirq.h
-> linux/smp_lock.h

This results in incomplete event declarations, spurious event
definitions and other kind of funny behaviours.

This is hardly fixable without ugly workarounds. So instead, we push
the file name, line number and function name as lock_kernel()
parameters, so that we only deal with the trace event header from
lib/kernel_lock.c

This adds two parameters to lock_kernel() and unlock_kernel() but
it should be fine wrt to performances because this pair dos not seem
to be called in fast paths.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
This commit is contained in:
Frederic Weisbecker 2009-09-28 17:12:49 +02:00
parent 3f6fe06dbf
commit 925936ebf3
2 changed files with 26 additions and 17 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

28
include/linux/smp_lock.h
View file

@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <trace/events/bkl.h>
#define kernel_locked() (current->lock_depth >= 0)
@ -25,18 +24,21 @@ static inline int reacquire_kernel_lock(struct task_struct *task)
return 0;
}
extern void __lockfunc _lock_kernel(void) __acquires(kernel_lock);
extern void __lockfunc _unlock_kernel(void) __releases(kernel_lock);
extern void __lockfunc
_lock_kernel(const char *func, const char *file, int line)
__acquires(kernel_lock);
#define lock_kernel() { \
trace_lock_kernel(__func__, __FILE__, __LINE__); \
_lock_kernel(); \
}
extern void __lockfunc
_unlock_kernel(const char *func, const char *file, int line)
__releases(kernel_lock);
#define unlock_kernel() { \
trace_unlock_kernel(__func__, __FILE__, __LINE__); \
_unlock_kernel(); \
}
#define lock_kernel() do { \
_lock_kernel(__func__, __FILE__, __LINE__); \
} while (0)
#define unlock_kernel() do { \
_unlock_kernel(__func__, __FILE__, __LINE__); \
} while (0)
/*
* Various legacy drivers don't really need the BKL in a specific
@ -52,8 +54,8 @@ static inline void cycle_kernel_lock(void)
#else
#define lock_kernel() trace_lock_kernel(__func__, __FILE__, __LINE__);
#define unlock_kernel() trace_unlock_kernel(__func__, __FILE__, __LINE__);
#define lock_kernel()
#define unlock_kernel()
#define release_kernel_lock(task) do { } while(0)
#define cycle_kernel_lock() do { } while(0)
#define reacquire_kernel_lock(task) 0

15
lib/kernel_lock.c
View file

@ -8,9 +8,11 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
#include <linux/semaphore.h>
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/bkl.h>
/*
* The 'big kernel lock'
*
@ -114,19 +116,24 @@ static inline void __unlock_kernel(void)
* This cannot happen asynchronously, so we only need to
* worry about other CPU's.
*/
void __lockfunc _lock_kernel(void)
void __lockfunc _lock_kernel(const char *func, const char *file, int line)
{
int depth = current->lock_depth+1;
int depth = current->lock_depth + 1;
trace_lock_kernel(func, file, line);
if (likely(!depth))
__lock_kernel();
current->lock_depth = depth;
}
void __lockfunc _unlock_kernel(void)
void __lockfunc _unlock_kernel(const char *func, const char *file, int line)
{
BUG_ON(current->lock_depth < 0);
if (likely(--current->lock_depth < 0))
__unlock_kernel();
trace_unlock_kernel(func, file, line);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_lock_kernel);