Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

list debugging: use WARN() instead of BUG()

Browse source 
Arjan noted that the list_head debugging is BUG'ing when it detects
corruption.  By causing the box to panic immediately, we're possibly
losing some bug reports.  Changing this to a WARN() should mean we at the
least start seeing reports collected at kerneloops.org

Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Dave Jones 2008-07-25 01:45:55 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent d955c78ac4
commit 924d9addb9
1 changed files with 14 additions and 22 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

24
lib/list_debug.c
View file

@ -20,18 +20,14 @@ void __list_add(struct list_head *new,
struct list_head *prev,
struct list_head *next)
{
if (unlikely(next->prev != prev)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "list_add corruption. next->prev should be "
WARN(next->prev != prev,
"list_add corruption. next->prev should be "
"prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
prev, next->prev, next);
BUG();
}
if (unlikely(prev->next != next)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "list_add corruption. prev->next should be "
WARN(prev->next != next,
"list_add corruption. prev->next should be "
"next (%p), but was %p. (prev=%p).\n",
next, prev->next, prev);
BUG();
}
next->prev = new;
new->next = next;
new->prev = prev;
@ -47,16 +43,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_add);
*/
void list_del(struct list_head *entry)
{
if (unlikely(entry->prev->next != entry)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, "
WARN(entry->prev->next != entry,
"list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, "
"but was %p\n", entry, entry->prev->next);
BUG();
}
if (unlikely(entry->next->prev != entry)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "list_del corruption. next->prev should be %p, "
WARN(entry->next->prev != entry,
"list_del corruption. next->prev should be %p, "
"but was %p\n", entry, entry->next->prev);
BUG();
}
__list_del(entry->prev, entry->next);
entry->next = LIST_POISON1;
entry->prev = LIST_POISON2;