KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: Add IRQ sorting
Adds the sorting function to cover the case where you have more IRQs to consider than you have LRs. We now consider priorities. Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
81eeb95ddb
commit
8e44474579
1 changed files with 57 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
#include <linux/kvm.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/list_sort.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include "vgic.h"
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -102,6 +103,62 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vgic_target_oracle(struct vgic_irq *irq)
|
|||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The order of items in the ap_lists defines how we'll pack things in LRs as
|
||||
* well, the first items in the list being the first things populated in the
|
||||
* LRs.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A hard rule is that active interrupts can never be pushed out of the LRs
|
||||
* (and therefore take priority) since we cannot reliably trap on deactivation
|
||||
* of IRQs and therefore they have to be present in the LRs.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Otherwise things should be sorted by the priority field and the GIC
|
||||
* hardware support will take care of preemption of priority groups etc.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Return negative if "a" sorts before "b", 0 to preserve order, and positive
|
||||
* to sort "b" before "a".
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int vgic_irq_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct vgic_irq *irqa = container_of(a, struct vgic_irq, ap_list);
|
||||
struct vgic_irq *irqb = container_of(b, struct vgic_irq, ap_list);
|
||||
bool penda, pendb;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&irqa->irq_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_nested(&irqb->irq_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
|
||||
|
||||
if (irqa->active || irqb->active) {
|
||||
ret = (int)irqb->active - (int)irqa->active;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
penda = irqa->enabled && irqa->pending;
|
||||
pendb = irqb->enabled && irqb->pending;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!penda || !pendb) {
|
||||
ret = (int)pendb - (int)penda;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Both pending and enabled, sort by priority */
|
||||
ret = irqa->priority - irqb->priority;
|
||||
out:
|
||||
spin_unlock(&irqb->irq_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&irqa->irq_lock);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Must be called with the ap_list_lock held */
|
||||
static void vgic_sort_ap_list(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
|
||||
|
||||
DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock));
|
||||
|
||||
list_sort(NULL, &vgic_cpu->ap_list_head, vgic_irq_cmp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Only valid injection if changing level for level-triggered IRQs or for a
|
||||
* rising edge.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue