Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

locking/rtmutex: Avoid a NULL pointer dereference on deadlock

Browse source 
With task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() returning early -EDEADLK we never
add the waiter to the waitqueue. Later, we try to remove it via
remove_waiter() and go boom in rt_mutex_top_waiter() because
rb_entry() gives a NULL pointer.

( Tested on v3.18-RT where rtmutex is used for regular mutex and I
  tried to get one twice in a row. )

Not sure when this started but I guess 397335f004 ("rtmutex: Fix
deadlock detector for real") or commit 3d5c9340d1 ("rtmutex:
Handle deadlock detection smarter").

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # for v3.16 and later kernels
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1424187823-19600-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2015-02-17 16:43:43 +01:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent e07e0d4cb0
commit 8d1e5a1a1c
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

1
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
View file

@ -1193,6 +1193,7 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, timeout, &waiter); ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, timeout, &waiter);
if (unlikely(ret)) { if (unlikely(ret)) {
if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
remove_waiter(lock, &waiter); remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, &waiter); rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, &waiter);
} }