wimax: usb-tx: mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through" annotation at the bottom of the case, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115075 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
849063074a
commit
8a8a894ebb
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -131,12 +131,12 @@ int i2400mu_tx(struct i2400mu *i2400mu, struct i2400m_msg_hdr *tx_msg,
|
|||
dev_err(dev, "BM-CMD: too many stalls in "
|
||||
"URB; resetting device\n");
|
||||
usb_queue_reset_device(i2400mu->usb_iface);
|
||||
/* fallthrough */
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
usb_clear_halt(i2400mu->usb_dev, usb_pipe);
|
||||
msleep(10); /* give the device some time */
|
||||
goto retry;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case -EINVAL: /* while removing driver */
|
||||
case -ENODEV: /* dev disconnect ... */
|
||||
case -ENOENT: /* just ignore it */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue