dm snapshot: merge consecutive chunks together
s->store->type->prepare_merge returns the number of chunks that can be copied linearly working backwards from the returned chunk number. For example, if it returns 3 chunks with old_chunk == 10 and new_chunk == 20, then chunk 20 can be copied to 10, chunk 19 to 9 and 18 to 8. Until now kcopyd only copied one chunk at a time. This patch now copies the full set at once. Consequently, snapshot_merge_process() needs to delay the merging of all chunks if any have writes in progress, not just the first chunk in the region that is to be merged. snapshot-merge's performance is now comparable to the original snapshot-origin target. Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
73dfd078cf
commit
8a2d528620
1 changed files with 21 additions and 10 deletions
|
@ -879,9 +879,10 @@ static void increment_pending_exceptions_done_count(void)
|
|||
|
||||
static void snapshot_merge_next_chunks(struct dm_snapshot *s)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
int i, linear_chunks;
|
||||
chunk_t old_chunk, new_chunk;
|
||||
struct dm_io_region src, dest;
|
||||
sector_t io_size;
|
||||
uint64_t previous_count;
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(!test_bit(RUNNING_MERGE, &s->state_bits));
|
||||
|
@ -896,20 +897,28 @@ static void snapshot_merge_next_chunks(struct dm_snapshot *s)
|
|||
goto shut;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
r = s->store->type->prepare_merge(s->store, &old_chunk, &new_chunk);
|
||||
if (r <= 0) {
|
||||
if (r < 0)
|
||||
linear_chunks = s->store->type->prepare_merge(s->store, &old_chunk,
|
||||
&new_chunk);
|
||||
if (linear_chunks <= 0) {
|
||||
if (linear_chunks < 0)
|
||||
DMERR("Read error in exception store: "
|
||||
"shutting down merge");
|
||||
goto shut;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* TODO: use larger I/O size once we verify that kcopyd handles it */
|
||||
/* Adjust old_chunk and new_chunk to reflect start of linear region */
|
||||
old_chunk = old_chunk + 1 - linear_chunks;
|
||||
new_chunk = new_chunk + 1 - linear_chunks;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Use one (potentially large) I/O to copy all 'linear_chunks'
|
||||
* from the exception store to the origin
|
||||
*/
|
||||
io_size = linear_chunks * s->store->chunk_size;
|
||||
|
||||
dest.bdev = s->origin->bdev;
|
||||
dest.sector = chunk_to_sector(s->store, old_chunk);
|
||||
dest.count = min((sector_t)s->store->chunk_size,
|
||||
get_dev_size(dest.bdev) - dest.sector);
|
||||
dest.count = min(io_size, get_dev_size(dest.bdev) - dest.sector);
|
||||
|
||||
src.bdev = s->cow->bdev;
|
||||
src.sector = chunk_to_sector(s->store, new_chunk);
|
||||
|
@ -925,7 +934,7 @@ static void snapshot_merge_next_chunks(struct dm_snapshot *s)
|
|||
* significant impact on performance.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
previous_count = read_pending_exceptions_done_count();
|
||||
while (origin_write_extent(s, dest.sector, s->store->chunk_size)) {
|
||||
while (origin_write_extent(s, dest.sector, io_size)) {
|
||||
wait_event(_pending_exceptions_done,
|
||||
(read_pending_exceptions_done_count() !=
|
||||
previous_count));
|
||||
|
@ -935,10 +944,12 @@ static void snapshot_merge_next_chunks(struct dm_snapshot *s)
|
|||
|
||||
down_write(&s->lock);
|
||||
s->first_merging_chunk = old_chunk;
|
||||
s->num_merging_chunks = 1;
|
||||
s->num_merging_chunks = linear_chunks;
|
||||
up_write(&s->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
__check_for_conflicting_io(s, old_chunk);
|
||||
/* Wait until writes to all 'linear_chunks' drain */
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < linear_chunks; i++)
|
||||
__check_for_conflicting_io(s, old_chunk + i);
|
||||
|
||||
dm_kcopyd_copy(s->kcopyd_client, &src, 1, &dest, 0, merge_callback, s);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue