From 880ae359173c229f5d5a44e08b529cffb102bbbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:27:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: fix spelling in design-patterns
This fixes two spelling mistakes in the design pattern doc.
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
Documentation/driver-model/design-patterns.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-model/design-patterns.txt b/Documentation/driver-model/design-patterns.txt
index 9ef8c1684558..ba7b2df64904 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-model/design-patterns.txt
+++ b/Documentation/driver-model/design-patterns.txt
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ your interrupt handler.
2. container_of()
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-Continuing on the above example we add a offloaded work:
+Continuing on the above example we add an offloaded work:
struct foo {
spinlock_t lock;
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static int foo_probe(...)
(...)
}
-The design pattern is the same for a a hrtimer or something similar that will
+The design pattern is the same for an hrtimer or something similar that will
return a single argument which is a pointer to a struct member in the
callback.