Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Documentation: robust-futexes: fix spelling mistakes

Browse source 
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
This commit is contained in:
Eric Engestrom 2016-04-25 07:37:00 +01:00 committed by Jonathan Corbet
parent c0270efc51
commit 86cbbe24b4
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
Documentation/robust-futexes.txt
View file

@ -126,9 +126,9 @@ vma based method:
- no VM changes are needed - 'struct address_space' is left alone.
- no registration of individual locks is needed: robust mutexes dont
- no registration of individual locks is needed: robust mutexes don't
need any extra per-lock syscalls. Robust mutexes thus become a very
lightweight primitive - so they dont force the application designer
lightweight primitive - so they don't force the application designer
to do a hard choice between performance and robustness - robust
mutexes are just as fast.
@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ and the remaining bits are for the TID.
Testing, architecture support
-----------------------------
i've tested the new syscalls on x86 and x86_64, and have made sure the
I've tested the new syscalls on x86 and x86_64, and have made sure the
parsing of the userspace list is robust [ ;-) ] even if the list is
deliberately corrupted.