Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

clk: ti/divider: fix rate calculation for fractional rates

Browse source 
ti/clk-divider.c does not calculate the rates consistently at the moment.

As an example, on OMAP3 we have a clock divider with a source clock of
864000000 Hz. With dividers 6, 7 and 8 the theoretical rates are:

6: 144000000
7: 123428571.428571...
8: 108000000

Calling clk_round_rate() with the rate in the first column will give the
rate in the second column:

144000000 -> 144000000
143999999 -> 123428571
123428572 -> 123428571
123428571 -> 108000000

Note how clk_round_rate() returns 123428571 for rates from 123428572 to
143999999, which is mathematically correct, but when clk_round_rate() is
called with 123428571, the returned value is surprisingly 108000000.

This means that the following code works a bit oddly:

rate = clk_round_rate(clk, 123428572);
clk_set_rate(clk, rate);

As clk_set_rate() also does clock rate rounding, the result is that the
clock is set to the rate of 108000000, not 123428571 returned by the
clk_round_rate.

This patch changes the ti/clk-divider.c to use DIV_ROUND_UP when
calculating the rate. This gives the following behavior which fixes the
inconsistency:

144000000 -> 144000000
143999999 -> 123428572
123428572 -> 123428572
123428571 -> 108000000

Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Tomi Valkeinen 2014-02-13 12:04:00 +02:00 committed by Mike Turquette
parent b11d282dbe
commit 7e50e7e176
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
drivers/clk/ti/divider.c
View file

@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static unsigned long ti_clk_divider_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
return parent_rate;
}
return parent_rate / div;
return DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, div);
}
/*
@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int ti_clk_divider_bestdiv(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
}
parent_rate = __clk_round_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk),
MULT_ROUND_UP(rate, i));
now = parent_rate / i;
now = DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, i);
if (now <= rate && now > best) {
bestdiv = i;
best = now;
@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static long ti_clk_divider_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
int div;
div = ti_clk_divider_bestdiv(hw, rate, prate);
return *prate / div;
return DIV_ROUND_UP(*prate, div);
}
static int ti_clk_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int ti_clk_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
unsigned long flags = 0;
u32 val;
div = parent_rate / rate;
div = DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, rate);
value = _get_val(divider, div);
if (value > div_mask(divider))