Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

xfrm: Allow inserting policies with matching mark and different priorities

Browse source 
We currently can not insert policies with mark and mask
such that some flows would be matched from both policies.
We make this possible when the priority of these policies
are different. If both policies match a flow, the one with
the higher priority is used.

Reported-by: Emmanuel Thierry <emmanuel.thierry@telecom-bretagne.eu>
Reported-by: Romain Kuntz <r.kuntz@ipflavors.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
This commit is contained in:
Steffen Klassert 2013-02-11 07:02:36 +01:00
parent 8d068875ca
commit 7cb8a93968
1 changed files with 16 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

18
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
View file

@ -607,6 +607,21 @@ static void xfrm_policy_requeue(struct xfrm_policy *old,
spin_unlock_bh(&pq->hold_queue.lock);
}
static bool xfrm_policy_mark_match(struct xfrm_policy *policy,
struct xfrm_policy *pol)
{
u32 mark = policy->mark.v & policy->mark.m;
if (policy->mark.v == pol->mark.v && policy->mark.m == pol->mark.m)
return true;
if ((mark & pol->mark.m) == pol->mark.v &&
policy->priority == pol->priority)
return true;
return false;
}
int xfrm_policy_insert(int dir, struct xfrm_policy *policy, int excl)
{
struct net *net = xp_net(policy);
@ -614,7 +629,6 @@ int xfrm_policy_insert(int dir, struct xfrm_policy *policy, int excl)
struct xfrm_policy *delpol;
struct hlist_head *chain;
struct hlist_node *entry, *newpos;
u32 mark = policy->mark.v & policy->mark.m;
write_lock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
chain = policy_hash_bysel(net, &policy->selector, policy->family, dir);
@ -623,7 +637,7 @@ int xfrm_policy_insert(int dir, struct xfrm_policy *policy, int excl)
hlist_for_each_entry(pol, entry, chain, bydst) {
if (pol->type == policy->type &&
!selector_cmp(&pol->selector, &policy->selector) &&
(mark & pol->mark.m) == pol->mark.v &&
xfrm_policy_mark_match(policy, pol) &&
xfrm_sec_ctx_match(pol->security, policy->security) &&
!WARN_ON(delpol)) {
if (excl) {