Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

ALSA: pcm - Fix regressions with VMware

Browse source 
VMware tends to report PCM positions and period updates at utterly
wrong timing.  This screws up the recent PCM core code that tries
to correct the position based on the irq timing.

Now, when a backward irq position is detected, skip the update
instead of rebasing.  (This is almost the old behavior before
2.6.30.)

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
Takashi Iwai 2009-07-22 12:51:51 +02:00
parent 6847e154e3
commit 79452f0a28
1 changed files with 10 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

11
sound/core/pcm_lib.c
View file

@ -244,18 +244,27 @@ static int snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr_interrupt(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
delta = new_hw_ptr - hw_ptr_interrupt;
}
if (delta < 0) {
delta += runtime->buffer_size;
if (runtime->periods == 1)
delta += runtime->buffer_size;
if (delta < 0) {
hw_ptr_error(substream,
"Unexpected hw_pointer value "
"(stream=%i, pos=%ld, intr_ptr=%ld)\n",
substream->stream, (long)pos,
(long)hw_ptr_interrupt);
#if 1
/* simply skipping the hwptr update seems more
* robust in some cases, e.g. on VMware with
* inaccurate timer source
*/
return 0; /* skip this update */
#else
/* rebase to interrupt position */
hw_base = new_hw_ptr = hw_ptr_interrupt;
/* align hw_base to buffer_size */
hw_base -= hw_base % runtime->buffer_size;
delta = 0;
#endif
} else {
hw_base += runtime->buffer_size;
if (hw_base >= runtime->boundary)