selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86: Add test cases for POPF
POPF is currently broken -- add tests to catch the error. This results in: [RUN] POPF with VIP set and IF clear from vm86 mode [INFO] Exited vm86 mode due to STI [FAIL] Incorrect return reason (started at eip = 0xd, ended at eip = 0xf) because POPF currently fails to check IF before reporting a pending interrupt. This patch also makes the FAIL message a bit more informative. Reported-by: Bart Oldeman <bartoldeman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a16270b5cfe7832d6d00c479d0f871066cbdb52b.1521003603.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
327d53d005
commit
78393fdde2
1 changed files with 27 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -95,6 +95,10 @@ asm (
|
|||
"int3\n\t"
|
||||
"vmcode_int80:\n\t"
|
||||
"int $0x80\n\t"
|
||||
"vmcode_popf_hlt:\n\t"
|
||||
"push %ax\n\t"
|
||||
"popf\n\t"
|
||||
"hlt\n\t"
|
||||
"vmcode_umip:\n\t"
|
||||
/* addressing via displacements */
|
||||
"smsw (2052)\n\t"
|
||||
|
@ -124,8 +128,8 @@ asm (
|
|||
|
||||
extern unsigned char vmcode[], end_vmcode[];
|
||||
extern unsigned char vmcode_bound[], vmcode_sysenter[], vmcode_syscall[],
|
||||
vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[], vmcode_umip[],
|
||||
vmcode_umip_str[], vmcode_umip_sldt[];
|
||||
vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[], vmcode_popf_hlt[],
|
||||
vmcode_umip[], vmcode_umip_str[], vmcode_umip_sldt[];
|
||||
|
||||
/* Returns false if the test was skipped. */
|
||||
static bool do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip,
|
||||
|
@ -175,7 +179,7 @@ static bool do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip,
|
|||
(VM86_TYPE(ret) == rettype && VM86_ARG(ret) == retarg)) {
|
||||
printf("[OK]\tReturned correctly\n");
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
printf("[FAIL]\tIncorrect return reason\n");
|
||||
printf("[FAIL]\tIncorrect return reason (started at eip = 0x%lx, ended at eip = 0x%lx)\n", eip, v86->regs.eip);
|
||||
nerrs++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -264,6 +268,9 @@ int main(void)
|
|||
v86.regs.ds = load_addr / 16;
|
||||
v86.regs.es = load_addr / 16;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Use the end of the page as our stack. */
|
||||
v86.regs.esp = 4096;
|
||||
|
||||
assert((v86.regs.cs & 3) == 0); /* Looks like RPL = 0 */
|
||||
|
||||
/* #BR -- should deliver SIG??? */
|
||||
|
@ -295,6 +302,23 @@ int main(void)
|
|||
v86.regs.eflags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_IF;
|
||||
do_test(&v86, vmcode_sti - vmcode, VM86_STI, 0, "STI with VIP set");
|
||||
|
||||
/* POPF with VIP set but IF clear: should not trap */
|
||||
v86.regs.eflags = X86_EFLAGS_VIP;
|
||||
v86.regs.eax = 0;
|
||||
do_test(&v86, vmcode_popf_hlt - vmcode, VM86_UNKNOWN, 0, "POPF with VIP set and IF clear");
|
||||
|
||||
/* POPF with VIP set and IF set: should trap */
|
||||
v86.regs.eflags = X86_EFLAGS_VIP;
|
||||
v86.regs.eax = X86_EFLAGS_IF;
|
||||
do_test(&v86, vmcode_popf_hlt - vmcode, VM86_STI, 0, "POPF with VIP and IF set");
|
||||
|
||||
/* POPF with VIP clear and IF set: should not trap */
|
||||
v86.regs.eflags = 0;
|
||||
v86.regs.eax = X86_EFLAGS_IF;
|
||||
do_test(&v86, vmcode_popf_hlt - vmcode, VM86_UNKNOWN, 0, "POPF with VIP clear and IF set");
|
||||
|
||||
v86.regs.eflags = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* INT3 -- should cause #BP */
|
||||
do_test(&v86, vmcode_int3 - vmcode, VM86_TRAP, 3, "INT3");
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue