rcu: Rename "empty" to "empty_norm" in preparation for boost rework
This commit undertakes a simple variable renaming to make way for some rework of RCU priority boosting. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b08ea27d95
commit
74e871ac6c
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -313,8 +313,8 @@ static struct list_head *rcu_next_node_entry(struct task_struct *t,
|
|||
*/
|
||||
void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int empty;
|
||||
int empty_exp;
|
||||
int empty_norm;
|
||||
int empty_exp_now;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
struct list_head *np;
|
||||
|
@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
|
|||
break;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
|
||||
}
|
||||
empty = !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp);
|
||||
empty_norm = !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp);
|
||||
empty_exp = !rcu_preempted_readers_exp(rnp);
|
||||
smp_mb(); /* ensure expedited fastpath sees end of RCU c-s. */
|
||||
np = rcu_next_node_entry(t, rnp);
|
||||
|
@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
|
|||
* so we must take a snapshot of the expedited state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
empty_exp_now = !rcu_preempted_readers_exp(rnp);
|
||||
if (!empty && !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)) {
|
||||
if (!empty_norm && !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)) {
|
||||
trace_rcu_quiescent_state_report(TPS("preempt_rcu"),
|
||||
rnp->gpnum,
|
||||
0, rnp->qsmask,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue