USB: cdc-acm: fix rounding error in TIOCSSERIAL
[ Upstream commit b401f8c4f492cbf74f3f59c9141e5be3071071bb ]
By default, tty_port_init() initializes those parameters to a multiple
of HZ. For instance in line 69 of tty_port.c:
port->close_delay = (50 * HZ) / 100;
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/tty/tty_port.c#L69
With e.g. CONFIG_HZ = 250 (as this is the case for Ubuntu 18.04
linux-image-4.15.0-37-generic), the default setting for close_delay is
thus 125.
When ioctl(fd, TIOCGSERIAL, &s) is executed, the setting returned in
user space is '12' (125/10). When ioctl(fd, TIOCSSERIAL, &s) is then
executed with the same setting '12', the value is interpreted as '120'
which is different from the current setting and a EPERM error may be
raised by set_serial_info() if !CAP_SYS_ADMIN.
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c#L919
Fixes: ba2d8ce9db
("cdc-acm: implement TIOCSSERIAL to avoid blocking close(2)")
Signed-off-by: Anthony Mallet <anthony.mallet@laas.fr>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312133101.7096-2-anthony.mallet@laas.fr
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c626124296
commit
72d3dd250a
1 changed files with 16 additions and 9 deletions
|
@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ static int set_serial_info(struct acm *acm,
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct serial_struct new_serial;
|
||||
unsigned int closing_wait, close_delay;
|
||||
unsigned int old_closing_wait, old_close_delay;
|
||||
int retval = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (copy_from_user(&new_serial, newinfo, sizeof(new_serial)))
|
||||
|
@ -940,18 +941,24 @@ static int set_serial_info(struct acm *acm,
|
|||
ASYNC_CLOSING_WAIT_NONE :
|
||||
msecs_to_jiffies(new_serial.closing_wait * 10);
|
||||
|
||||
/* we must redo the rounding here, so that the values match */
|
||||
old_close_delay = jiffies_to_msecs(acm->port.close_delay) / 10;
|
||||
old_closing_wait = acm->port.closing_wait == ASYNC_CLOSING_WAIT_NONE ?
|
||||
ASYNC_CLOSING_WAIT_NONE :
|
||||
jiffies_to_msecs(acm->port.closing_wait) / 10;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&acm->port.mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
|
||||
if ((close_delay != acm->port.close_delay) ||
|
||||
(closing_wait != acm->port.closing_wait))
|
||||
if ((new_serial.close_delay != old_close_delay) ||
|
||||
(new_serial.closing_wait != old_closing_wait)) {
|
||||
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
|
||||
retval = -EPERM;
|
||||
else
|
||||
retval = -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
acm->port.close_delay = close_delay;
|
||||
acm->port.closing_wait = closing_wait;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
acm->port.close_delay = close_delay;
|
||||
acm->port.closing_wait = closing_wait;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else
|
||||
retval = -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&acm->port.mutex);
|
||||
return retval;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue