ext2: fix a typo on comment in ext2/inode.c
'excpet' should be 'except'. 'ext3_get_branch' should be 'ext2_get_branch'. Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
This commit is contained in:
parent
35df83970e
commit
72b43570f3
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static int ext2_alloc_blocks(struct inode *inode,
|
||||||
* the same format as ext2_get_branch() would do. We are calling it after
|
* the same format as ext2_get_branch() would do. We are calling it after
|
||||||
* we had read the existing part of chain and partial points to the last
|
* we had read the existing part of chain and partial points to the last
|
||||||
* triple of that (one with zero ->key). Upon the exit we have the same
|
* triple of that (one with zero ->key). Upon the exit we have the same
|
||||||
* picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), excpet that in one
|
* picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), except that in one
|
||||||
* place chain is disconnected - *branch->p is still zero (we did not
|
* place chain is disconnected - *branch->p is still zero (we did not
|
||||||
* set the last link), but branch->key contains the number that should
|
* set the last link), but branch->key contains the number that should
|
||||||
* be placed into *branch->p to fill that gap.
|
* be placed into *branch->p to fill that gap.
|
||||||
|
@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int ext2_get_blocks(struct inode *inode,
|
||||||
mutex_lock(&ei->truncate_mutex);
|
mutex_lock(&ei->truncate_mutex);
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* If the indirect block is missing while we are reading
|
* If the indirect block is missing while we are reading
|
||||||
* the chain(ext3_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or
|
* the chain(ext2_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or
|
||||||
* if the chain has been changed after we grab the semaphore,
|
* if the chain has been changed after we grab the semaphore,
|
||||||
* (either because another process truncated this branch, or
|
* (either because another process truncated this branch, or
|
||||||
* another get_block allocated this branch) re-grab the chain to see if
|
* another get_block allocated this branch) re-grab the chain to see if
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue