Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

ext2: fix a typo on comment in ext2/inode.c

Browse source 
'excpet' should be 'except'.
'ext3_get_branch' should be 'ext2_get_branch'.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
This commit is contained in:
Namhyung Kim 2010-09-15 21:46:02 +09:00 committed by Jiri Kosina
parent 35df83970e
commit 72b43570f3
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
fs/ext2/inode.c
View file

@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static int ext2_alloc_blocks(struct inode *inode,
* the same format as ext2_get_branch() would do. We are calling it after
* we had read the existing part of chain and partial points to the last
* triple of that (one with zero ->key). Upon the exit we have the same
* picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), excpet that in one
* picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), except that in one
* place chain is disconnected - *branch->p is still zero (we did not
* set the last link), but branch->key contains the number that should
* be placed into *branch->p to fill that gap.
@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int ext2_get_blocks(struct inode *inode,
mutex_lock(&ei->truncate_mutex);
/*
* If the indirect block is missing while we are reading
* the chain(ext3_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or
* the chain(ext2_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or
* if the chain has been changed after we grab the semaphore,
* (either because another process truncated this branch, or
* another get_block allocated this branch) re-grab the chain to see if