ALSA: mixart: Mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comment with a proper "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114889 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0c93c5ce10
commit
725097323b
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ irqreturn_t snd_mixart_threaded_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
|
|||
dev_err(&mgr->pci->dev,
|
||||
"canceled notification %x !\n", msg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* no break, continue ! */
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case MSG_TYPE_ANSWER:
|
||||
/* answer or notification to a message we are waiting for*/
|
||||
mutex_lock(&mgr->msg_lock);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue