From 6d92d4f6a74766cc885b18218268e0c47fbca399 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:31:48 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] fs/exec.c: work around icc miscompilation

The tricky problem is this check:

	if (i++ >= max)

icc (mis)optimizes this check as:

	if (++i > max)

The check now becomes a no-op since max is MAX_ARG_STRINGS (0x7FFFFFFF).

This is "allowed" by the C standard, assuming i++ never overflows,
because signed integer overflow is undefined behavior.  This
optimization effectively reverts the previous commit 362e6663ef23
("exec.c, compat.c: fix count(), compat_count() bounds checking") that
tries to fix the check.

This patch simply moves ++ after the check.

Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 fs/exec.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 18c45cac368f..20df02c1cc70 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -434,8 +434,9 @@ static int count(struct user_arg_ptr argv, int max)
 			if (IS_ERR(p))
 				return -EFAULT;
 
-			if (i++ >= max)
+			if (i >= max)
 				return -E2BIG;
+			++i;
 
 			if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
 				return -ERESTARTNOHAND;