sched: do not hurt SCHED_BATCH on wakeup
measurements by Yanmin Zhang have shown that SCHED_BATCH tasks benefit if they run the same place_entity() logic as SCHED_OTHER tasks - so uniformize behavior in this area. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2bacec8c31
commit
6cbf1c126c
1 changed files with 1 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -511,8 +511,7 @@ place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int initial)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!initial) {
|
if (!initial) {
|
||||||
/* sleeps upto a single latency don't count. */
|
/* sleeps upto a single latency don't count. */
|
||||||
if (sched_feat(NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS) && entity_is_task(se) &&
|
if (sched_feat(NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS) && entity_is_task(se))
|
||||||
task_of(se)->policy != SCHED_BATCH)
|
|
||||||
vruntime -= sysctl_sched_latency;
|
vruntime -= sysctl_sched_latency;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */
|
/* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue