locking/mutex: Optimize mutex_trylock() fast-path
A while back Viro posted a number of 'interesting' mutex_is_locked() users on IRC, one of those was RCU. RCU seems to use mutex_is_locked() to avoid doing mutex_trylock(), the regular load before modify pattern. While the use isn't wrong per se, its curious in that its needed at all, mutex_trylock() should be good enough on its own to avoid the pointless cacheline bounces. So fix those and remove the mutex_is_locked() (ab)use from RCU. Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160601185815.GW3190@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ddd0fa73c2
commit
6428671bae
7 changed files with 12 additions and 9 deletions
|
@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
|||
static inline int
|
||||
__mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (cmpxchg_acq(count, 1, 0) == 1)
|
||||
if (atomic_read(count) == 1 && cmpxchg_acq(count, 1, 0) == 1)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
|||
static inline int
|
||||
__mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (likely(__mutex_cmpxchg_lock(count, 1, 0) == 1))
|
||||
if (likely(atomic_read(count) == 1 && __mutex_cmpxchg_lock(count, 1, 0) == 1))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static inline int __mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count,
|
|||
int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* cmpxchg because it never induces a false contention state. */
|
||||
if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0) == 1))
|
||||
if (likely(atomic_read(count) == 1 && atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0) == 1))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -118,10 +118,10 @@ do { \
|
|||
static inline int __mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count,
|
||||
int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0) == 1))
|
||||
if (likely(atomic_read(count) == 1 && atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0) == 1))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* _ASM_X86_MUTEX_64_H */
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
|||
static inline int
|
||||
__mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(count, 1, 0) == 1))
|
||||
if (likely(atomic_read(count) == 1 && atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(count, 1, 0) == 1))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -91,8 +91,12 @@ __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
|||
static inline int
|
||||
__mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
||||
{
|
||||
int prev = atomic_xchg_acquire(count, 0);
|
||||
int prev;
|
||||
|
||||
if (atomic_read(count) != 1)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
prev = atomic_xchg_acquire(count, 0);
|
||||
if (unlikely(prev < 0)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The lock was marked contended so we must restore that
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3681,7 +3681,6 @@ static bool exp_funnel_lock(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long s)
|
|||
if (ULONG_CMP_LT(READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_seq_rq), s) &&
|
||||
(rnp == rnp_root ||
|
||||
ULONG_CMP_LT(READ_ONCE(rnp_root->exp_seq_rq), s)) &&
|
||||
!mutex_is_locked(&rsp->exp_mutex) &&
|
||||
mutex_trylock(&rsp->exp_mutex))
|
||||
goto fastpath;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue