Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

tipc: Prevent loss of fragmented messages over broadcast link

Browse source 
Modifies broadcast link so that an incoming fragmented message is not
lost if reassembly cannot begin because there currently is no buffer
big enough to hold the entire reassembled message. The broadcast link
now ignores the first fragment completely, which causes the sending node
to retransmit the first fragment so that reassembly can be re-attempted.

Previously, the sender would have had no reason to retransmit the 1st
fragment, so we would never have a chance to re-try the allocation.

To do this cleanly without duplicaton, a new bclink_accept_pkt()
function is introduced.

Signed-off-by: Allan Stephens <allan.stephens@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
This commit is contained in:
Allan Stephens 2011-10-27 16:43:09 -04:00 committed by Paul Gortmaker
parent b76b27cad5
commit 63e7f1ac28
1 changed files with 42 additions and 22 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

64
net/tipc/bcast.c
View file

@ -389,7 +389,33 @@ int tipc_bclink_send_msg(struct sk_buff *buf)
return res;
}
/**
/*
* bclink_accept_pkt - accept an incoming, in-sequence broadcast packet
*
* Called with both sending node's lock and bc_lock taken.
*/
static void bclink_accept_pkt(struct tipc_node *node, u32 seqno)
{
bclink_update_last_sent(node, seqno);
node->bclink.last_in = seqno;
node->bclink.oos_state = 0;
bcl->stats.recv_info++;
/*
* Unicast an ACK periodically, ensuring that
* all nodes in the cluster don't ACK at the same time
*/
if (((seqno - tipc_own_addr) % TIPC_MIN_LINK_WIN) == 0) {
tipc_link_send_proto_msg(
node->active_links[node->addr & 1],
STATE_MSG, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
bcl->stats.sent_acks++;
}
}
/*
* tipc_bclink_recv_pkt - receive a broadcast packet, and deliver upwards
*
* tipc_net_lock is read_locked, no other locks set
@ -443,29 +469,12 @@ void tipc_bclink_recv_pkt(struct sk_buff *buf)
next_in = mod(node->bclink.last_in + 1);
if (likely(seqno == next_in)) {
bclink_update_last_sent(node, seqno);
receive:
node->bclink.last_in = seqno;
node->bclink.oos_state = 0;
spin_lock_bh(&bc_lock);
bcl->stats.recv_info++;
/*
* Unicast an ACK periodically, ensuring that
* all nodes in the cluster don't ACK at the same time
*/
if (((seqno - tipc_own_addr) % TIPC_MIN_LINK_WIN) == 0) {
tipc_link_send_proto_msg(
node->active_links[node->addr & 1],
STATE_MSG, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
bcl->stats.sent_acks++;
}
/* Deliver message to destination */
if (likely(msg_isdata(msg))) {
spin_lock_bh(&bc_lock);
bclink_accept_pkt(node, seqno);
spin_unlock_bh(&bc_lock);
tipc_node_unlock(node);
if (likely(msg_mcast(msg)))
@ -473,24 +482,35 @@ void tipc_bclink_recv_pkt(struct sk_buff *buf)
else
buf_discard(buf);
} else if (msg_user(msg) == MSG_BUNDLER) {
spin_lock_bh(&bc_lock);
bclink_accept_pkt(node, seqno);
bcl->stats.recv_bundles++;
bcl->stats.recv_bundled += msg_msgcnt(msg);
spin_unlock_bh(&bc_lock);
tipc_node_unlock(node);
tipc_link_recv_bundle(buf);
} else if (msg_user(msg) == MSG_FRAGMENTER) {
int ret = tipc_link_recv_fragment(&node->bclink.defragm,
&buf, &msg);
if (ret < 0)
goto unlock;
spin_lock_bh(&bc_lock);
bclink_accept_pkt(node, seqno);
bcl->stats.recv_fragments++;
if (tipc_link_recv_fragment(&node->bclink.defragm,
&buf, &msg))
if (ret > 0)
bcl->stats.recv_fragmented++;
spin_unlock_bh(&bc_lock);
tipc_node_unlock(node);
tipc_net_route_msg(buf);
} else if (msg_user(msg) == NAME_DISTRIBUTOR) {
spin_lock_bh(&bc_lock);
bclink_accept_pkt(node, seqno);
spin_unlock_bh(&bc_lock);
tipc_node_unlock(node);
tipc_named_recv(buf);
} else {
spin_lock_bh(&bc_lock);
bclink_accept_pkt(node, seqno);
spin_unlock_bh(&bc_lock);
tipc_node_unlock(node);
buf_discard(buf);