From 621997cd392a541bbe964e7521e2e4b2a7a03c4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 00:57:04 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] 9p: fix rename return code

9p doesn't handle renames between directories -- however, we were returning
EPERM instead of EXDEV when we detected this case.

Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergren <ericvh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
index 18f26cdfd882..05d30e89ba45 100644
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
@@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ v9fs_vfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
 	/* 9P can only handle file rename in the same directory */
 	if (memcmp(&olddirfid->qid, &newdirfid->qid, sizeof(newdirfid->qid))) {
 		dprintk(DEBUG_ERROR, "old dir and new dir are different\n");
-		retval = -EPERM;
+		retval = -EXDEV;
 		goto FreeFcallnBail;
 	}