[NET]: Fix secondary unicast/multicast address count maintenance

When a reference to an existing address is increased or decreased without
hitting zero, the address count is incorrectly adjusted.

Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Patrick McHardy 2007-06-30 13:35:52 -07:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent d62733c8e4
commit 61cbc2fca6
3 changed files with 16 additions and 20 deletions

View file

@ -1091,8 +1091,8 @@ extern int dev_unicast_add(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen);
extern int dev_mc_delete(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen, int all);
extern int dev_mc_add(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen, int newonly);
extern void dev_mc_discard(struct net_device *dev);
extern int __dev_addr_delete(struct dev_addr_list **list, void *addr, int alen, int all);
extern int __dev_addr_add(struct dev_addr_list **list, void *addr, int alen, int newonly);
extern int __dev_addr_delete(struct dev_addr_list **list, int *count, void *addr, int alen, int all);
extern int __dev_addr_add(struct dev_addr_list **list, int *count, void *addr, int alen, int newonly);
extern void __dev_addr_discard(struct dev_addr_list **list);
extern void dev_set_promiscuity(struct net_device *dev, int inc);
extern void dev_set_allmulti(struct net_device *dev, int inc);

View file

@ -2607,8 +2607,8 @@ void dev_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
}
int __dev_addr_delete(struct dev_addr_list **list, void *addr, int alen,
int glbl)
int __dev_addr_delete(struct dev_addr_list **list, int *count,
void *addr, int alen, int glbl)
{
struct dev_addr_list *da;
@ -2626,13 +2626,15 @@ int __dev_addr_delete(struct dev_addr_list **list, void *addr, int alen,
*list = da->next;
kfree(da);
(*count)--;
return 0;
}
}
return -ENOENT;
}
int __dev_addr_add(struct dev_addr_list **list, void *addr, int alen, int glbl)
int __dev_addr_add(struct dev_addr_list **list, int *count,
void *addr, int alen, int glbl)
{
struct dev_addr_list *da;
@ -2659,6 +2661,7 @@ int __dev_addr_add(struct dev_addr_list **list, void *addr, int alen, int glbl)
da->da_gusers = glbl ? 1 : 0;
da->next = *list;
*list = da;
(*count)++;
return 0;
}
@ -2692,11 +2695,9 @@ int dev_unicast_delete(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen)
ASSERT_RTNL();
netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);
err = __dev_addr_delete(&dev->uc_list, addr, alen, 0);
if (!err) {
dev->uc_count--;
err = __dev_addr_delete(&dev->uc_list, &dev->uc_count, addr, alen, 0);
if (!err)
__dev_set_rx_mode(dev);
}
netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
return err;
}
@ -2718,11 +2719,9 @@ int dev_unicast_add(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen)
ASSERT_RTNL();
netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);
err = __dev_addr_add(&dev->uc_list, addr, alen, 0);
if (!err) {
dev->uc_count++;
err = __dev_addr_add(&dev->uc_list, &dev->uc_count, addr, alen, 0);
if (!err)
__dev_set_rx_mode(dev);
}
netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
return err;
}

View file

@ -72,10 +72,9 @@ int dev_mc_delete(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen, int glbl)
int err;
netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);
err = __dev_addr_delete(&dev->mc_list, addr, alen, glbl);
err = __dev_addr_delete(&dev->mc_list, &dev->mc_count,
addr, alen, glbl);
if (!err) {
dev->mc_count--;
/*
* We have altered the list, so the card
* loaded filter is now wrong. Fix it
@ -96,11 +95,9 @@ int dev_mc_add(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen, int glbl)
int err;
netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);
err = __dev_addr_add(&dev->mc_list, addr, alen, glbl);
if (!err) {
dev->mc_count++;
err = __dev_addr_add(&dev->mc_list, &dev->mc_count, addr, alen, glbl);
if (!err)
__dev_set_rx_mode(dev);
}
netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
return err;
}