cfq-iosched: read_lock() does not always imply rcu_read_lock()
For some configurations of CONFIG_PREEMPT that is not true. So get rid of __call_for_each_cic() and always uses the explicitly rcu_read_lock() protected call_for_each_cic() instead. This fixes a potential bug related to IO scheduler removal or online switching. Thanks to Paul McKenney for clarifying this. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bd900d4580
commit
5f45c69589
1 changed files with 8 additions and 16 deletions
|
@ -2581,20 +2581,6 @@ static void cfq_put_queue(struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
|
|||
cfq_put_cfqg(cfqg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Must always be called with the rcu_read_lock() held
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void
|
||||
__call_for_each_cic(struct io_context *ioc,
|
||||
void (*func)(struct io_context *, struct cfq_io_context *))
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct cfq_io_context *cic;
|
||||
struct hlist_node *n;
|
||||
|
||||
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(cic, n, &ioc->cic_list, cic_list)
|
||||
func(ioc, cic);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Call func for each cic attached to this ioc.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -2602,8 +2588,14 @@ static void
|
|||
call_for_each_cic(struct io_context *ioc,
|
||||
void (*func)(struct io_context *, struct cfq_io_context *))
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct cfq_io_context *cic;
|
||||
struct hlist_node *n;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
__call_for_each_cic(ioc, func);
|
||||
|
||||
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(cic, n, &ioc->cic_list, cic_list)
|
||||
func(ioc, cic);
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2664,7 +2656,7 @@ static void cfq_free_io_context(struct io_context *ioc)
|
|||
* should be ok to iterate over the known list, we will see all cic's
|
||||
* since no new ones are added.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
__call_for_each_cic(ioc, cic_free_func);
|
||||
call_for_each_cic(ioc, cic_free_func);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void cfq_put_cooperator(struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue