Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

x86/oprofile: Fix usage of NUM_CONTROLS/NUM_COUNTERS macros

Browse source 
Use the corresponding macros when iterating over counter and control
registers. Since NUM_CONTROLS and NUM_COUNTERS are equal for AMD cpus
the fix is more a cosmetical change.

Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
This commit is contained in:
Robert Richter 2009-07-08 14:54:17 +02:00
parent 4d4036e0e7
commit 5e766e3e43
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c
View file

@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void op_amd_fill_in_addresses(struct op_msrs * const msrs)
#ifdef CONFIG_OPROFILE_EVENT_MULTIPLEX
for (i = 0; i < NUM_VIRT_COUNTERS; i++) {
int hw_counter = i % NUM_CONTROLS;
int hw_counter = i % NUM_COUNTERS;
if (reserve_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i))
msrs->multiplex[i].addr = MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + hw_counter;
else
@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static void op_amd_shutdown(struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
if (msrs->counters[i].addr)
release_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i);
}
for (i = 0; i < NUM_COUNTERS; ++i) {
for (i = 0; i < NUM_CONTROLS; ++i) {
if (msrs->controls[i].addr)
release_evntsel_nmi(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 + i);
}