acpi: Replace weird use of PTR_RET.
This functions is really weird. It sets rc to -ENOMEM, then overrides
it. It was converted to PTR_RET in a1458187
when it should have
simply been rewritten.
This version makes it more explicit, with a single IS_ERR() test.
Cc: Alexandru Gheorghiu <gheorghiuandru@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
228b82211b
commit
5d7e438629
1 changed files with 8 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -231,16 +231,19 @@ static struct task_struct *ps_tsks[NR_CPUS];
|
|||
static unsigned int ps_tsk_num;
|
||||
static int create_power_saving_task(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int rc = -ENOMEM;
|
||||
int rc;
|
||||
|
||||
ps_tsks[ps_tsk_num] = kthread_run(power_saving_thread,
|
||||
(void *)(unsigned long)ps_tsk_num,
|
||||
"acpi_pad/%d", ps_tsk_num);
|
||||
rc = PTR_RET(ps_tsks[ps_tsk_num]);
|
||||
if (!rc)
|
||||
ps_tsk_num++;
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(ps_tsks[ps_tsk_num])) {
|
||||
rc = PTR_ERR(ps_tsks[ps_tsk_num]);
|
||||
ps_tsks[ps_tsk_num] = NULL;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
rc = 0;
|
||||
ps_tsk_num++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue