[BLUETOOTH]: Always send explicit hci_ll wake-up acks.
In the (rare) event of simultaneous mutual wake up requests, do send the chip an explicit wake-up ack. This is required for Texas Instruments's BRF6350 chip. Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@bencohen.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f951375d47
commit
5c54822665
1 changed files with 14 additions and 9 deletions
|
@ -204,6 +204,19 @@ static void ll_device_want_to_wakeup(struct hci_uart *hu)
|
|||
spin_lock_irqsave(&ll->hcill_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
switch (ll->hcill_state) {
|
||||
case HCILL_ASLEEP_TO_AWAKE:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This state means that both the host and the BRF chip
|
||||
* have simultaneously sent a wake-up-indication packet.
|
||||
* Traditionaly, in this case, receiving a wake-up-indication
|
||||
* was enough and an additional wake-up-ack wasn't needed.
|
||||
* This has changed with the BRF6350, which does require an
|
||||
* explicit wake-up-ack. Other BRF versions, which do not
|
||||
* require an explicit ack here, do accept it, thus it is
|
||||
* perfectly safe to always send one.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BT_DBG("dual wake-up-indication");
|
||||
/* deliberate fall-through - do not add break */
|
||||
case HCILL_ASLEEP:
|
||||
/* acknowledge device wake up */
|
||||
if (send_hcill_cmd(HCILL_WAKE_UP_ACK, hu) < 0) {
|
||||
|
@ -211,16 +224,8 @@ static void ll_device_want_to_wakeup(struct hci_uart *hu)
|
|||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case HCILL_ASLEEP_TO_AWAKE:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* this state means that a wake-up-indication
|
||||
* is already on its way to the device,
|
||||
* and will serve as the required wake-up-ack
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BT_DBG("dual wake-up-indication");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
/* any other state are illegal */
|
||||
/* any other state is illegal */
|
||||
BT_ERR("received HCILL_WAKE_UP_IND in state %ld", ll->hcill_state);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue