[ARM] Fix Integrator and Versatile interrupt initialisation

Both Integrator and Versatile were using set_irq_handler() and
enable_irq(), and working around the initialisation of the
chained interrupt, instead of the more correct
set_irq_chained_handler() function.  Fix Integrator and
Versatile to use the right function, and remove these work-arounds.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Russell King 2006-06-10 12:42:12 +01:00 committed by Russell King
parent e2f04e1894
commit 56f1319e87
2 changed files with 3 additions and 7 deletions

View file

@ -232,8 +232,6 @@ static void __init intcp_init_irq(void)
for (i = IRQ_PIC_START; i <= IRQ_PIC_END; i++) { for (i = IRQ_PIC_START; i <= IRQ_PIC_END; i++) {
if (i == 11) if (i == 11)
i = 22; i = 22;
if (i == IRQ_CP_CPPLDINT)
i++;
if (i == 29) if (i == 29)
break; break;
set_irq_chip(i, &pic_chip); set_irq_chip(i, &pic_chip);
@ -259,8 +257,7 @@ static void __init intcp_init_irq(void)
set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE); set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
} }
set_irq_handler(IRQ_CP_CPPLDINT, sic_handle_irq); set_irq_chained_handler(IRQ_CP_CPPLDINT, sic_handle_irq);
pic_unmask_irq(IRQ_CP_CPPLDINT);
} }
/* /*

View file

@ -112,10 +112,9 @@ void __init versatile_init_irq(void)
{ {
unsigned int i; unsigned int i;
vic_init(VA_VIC_BASE, IRQ_VIC_START, ~(1 << 31)); vic_init(VA_VIC_BASE, IRQ_VIC_START, ~0);
set_irq_handler(IRQ_VICSOURCE31, sic_handle_irq); set_irq_chained_handler(IRQ_VICSOURCE31, sic_handle_irq);
enable_irq(IRQ_VICSOURCE31);
/* Do second interrupt controller */ /* Do second interrupt controller */
writel(~0, VA_SIC_BASE + SIC_IRQ_ENABLE_CLEAR); writel(~0, VA_SIC_BASE + SIC_IRQ_ENABLE_CLEAR);