Fix comment on pinctrl_gpio_range.pin_base
The comment introduced with the recently added pinctrl_gpio_range.pins element was wrong. This corrects it. Thanks to Patrice Chotard for pointing this out. Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
30cf821ea8
commit
56a59911e5
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct pinctrl_pin_desc {
|
|||
* @name: a name for the chip in this range
|
||||
* @id: an ID number for the chip in this range
|
||||
* @base: base offset of the GPIO range
|
||||
* @pin_base: base pin number of the GPIO range if pins != NULL
|
||||
* @pin_base: base pin number of the GPIO range if pins == NULL
|
||||
* @pins: enumeration of pins in GPIO range or NULL
|
||||
* @npins: number of pins in the GPIO range, including the base number
|
||||
* @gc: an optional pointer to a gpio_chip
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue