Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

tick-common: Fix wrong check in tick_check_replacement()

Browse source 
tick_check_replacement() returns if a replacement of clock_event_device is
possible or not. It does this as the first check:

	if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
		return false;

Thats wrong. tick_check_percpu() returns true when the device is
useable. Check for false instead.

[ tglx: Massaged changelog ]

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.11+
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com
Cc: Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com
Cc: linaro-networking@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/486a02efe0246635aaba786e24b42d316438bf3b.1397537987.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
Viresh Kumar 2014-04-15 10:54:37 +05:30 committed by Thomas Gleixner
parent 55101e2d6c
commit 521c42990e
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
kernel/time/tick-common.c
View file

@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static bool tick_check_preferred(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
bool tick_check_replacement(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
struct clock_event_device *newdev)
{
if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
return false;
return tick_check_preferred(curdev, newdev);