Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

[ROSE]: Fix routing table locking in rose_remove_neigh.

Browse source 
The locking rule for rose_remove_neigh() are that the caller needs to
hold rose_neigh_list_lock, so we better don't take it yet again in
rose_neigh_list_lock.

Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Ralf Baechle 2006-05-03 23:26:20 -07:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 70868eace5
commit 4cc7c2734e
1 changed files with 0 additions and 5 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

5
net/rose/rose_route.c
View file

@ -233,11 +233,8 @@ static void rose_remove_neigh(struct rose_neigh *rose_neigh)
skb_queue_purge(&rose_neigh->queue);
spin_lock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
if ((s = rose_neigh_list) == rose_neigh) {
rose_neigh_list = rose_neigh->next;
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
kfree(rose_neigh->digipeat);
kfree(rose_neigh);
return;
@ -246,7 +243,6 @@ static void rose_remove_neigh(struct rose_neigh *rose_neigh)
while (s != NULL && s->next != NULL) {
if (s->next == rose_neigh) {
s->next = rose_neigh->next;
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
kfree(rose_neigh->digipeat);
kfree(rose_neigh);
return;
@ -254,7 +250,6 @@ static void rose_remove_neigh(struct rose_neigh *rose_neigh)
s = s->next;
}
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
}
/*