PCI: Drop is_64bit_address() and is_mask_bit_support() macros
is_64bit_address() and is_mask_bit_support() don't provide any useful abstraction, so drop them. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2f22134936
commit
4987ce8205
2 changed files with 2 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -555,9 +555,9 @@ static int msi_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec)
|
|||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
entry->msi_attrib.is_msix = 0;
|
||||
entry->msi_attrib.is_64 = is_64bit_address(control);
|
||||
entry->msi_attrib.is_64 = !!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT);
|
||||
entry->msi_attrib.entry_nr = 0;
|
||||
entry->msi_attrib.maskbit = is_mask_bit_support(control);
|
||||
entry->msi_attrib.maskbit = !!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT);
|
||||
entry->msi_attrib.default_irq = dev->irq; /* Save IOAPIC IRQ */
|
||||
entry->msi_attrib.pos = dev->msi_cap;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -8,8 +8,6 @@
|
|||
|
||||
#define msi_mask_reg(base, is64bit) \
|
||||
(base + ((is64bit == 1) ? PCI_MSI_MASK_64 : PCI_MSI_MASK_32))
|
||||
#define is_64bit_address(control) (!!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT))
|
||||
#define is_mask_bit_support(control) (!!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT))
|
||||
|
||||
#define msix_table_offset_reg(base) (base + PCI_MSIX_TABLE)
|
||||
#define msix_pba_offset_reg(base) (base + PCI_MSIX_PBA)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue