xen: Do not suspend IPI IRQs.
In general the semantics of IPIs are that they are are expected to continue functioning after dpm_suspend_noirq(). Specifically I have seen a deadlock between the callfunc IPI and the stop machine used by xen's do_suspend() routine. If one CPU has already called dpm_suspend_noirq() then there is a window where it can be sent a callfunc IPI before all the other CPUs have entered stop_cpu(). If this happens then the first CPU ends up spinning in stop_cpu() waiting for the other to rendezvous in state STOPMACHINE_PREPARE while the other is spinning in csd_lock_wait(). Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com LKML-Reference: <1280398595-29708-4-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ba461f094b
commit
4877c73728
1 changed files with 1 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ int bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(enum ipi_vector ipi,
|
|||
if (irq < 0)
|
||||
return irq;
|
||||
|
||||
irqflags |= IRQF_NO_SUSPEND;
|
||||
retval = request_irq(irq, handler, irqflags, devname, dev_id);
|
||||
if (retval != 0) {
|
||||
unbind_from_irq(irq);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue