KVM: s390: use simple switch statement as multiplexer
We currently do some magic shifting (by exploiting that exit codes are always a multiple of 4) and a table lookup to jump into the exit handlers. This causes some calculations and checks, just to do an potentially expensive function call. Changing that to a switch statement gives the compiler the chance to inline and dynamically decide between jump tables or inline compare and branches. In addition it makes the code more readable. bloat-o-meter gives me a small reduction in code size: add/remove: 0/7 grow/shrink: 1/1 up/down: 986/-1334 (-348) function old new delta kvm_handle_sie_intercept 72 1058 +986 handle_prog 704 696 -8 handle_noop 54 - -54 handle_partial_execution 60 - -60 intercept_funcs 120 - -120 handle_instruction 198 - -198 handle_validity 210 - -210 handle_stop 316 - -316 handle_external_interrupt 368 - -368 Right now my gcc does conditional branches instead of jump tables. The inlining seems to give us enough cycles as some micro-benchmarking shows minimal improvements, but still in noise. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
58c383c62e
commit
46b708ea87
1 changed files with 21 additions and 21 deletions
|
@ -336,28 +336,28 @@ static int handle_partial_execution(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
|
|||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static const intercept_handler_t intercept_funcs[] = {
|
||||
[0x00 >> 2] = handle_noop,
|
||||
[0x04 >> 2] = handle_instruction,
|
||||
[0x08 >> 2] = handle_prog,
|
||||
[0x10 >> 2] = handle_noop,
|
||||
[0x14 >> 2] = handle_external_interrupt,
|
||||
[0x18 >> 2] = handle_noop,
|
||||
[0x1C >> 2] = kvm_s390_handle_wait,
|
||||
[0x20 >> 2] = handle_validity,
|
||||
[0x28 >> 2] = handle_stop,
|
||||
[0x38 >> 2] = handle_partial_execution,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
int kvm_handle_sie_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
intercept_handler_t func;
|
||||
u8 code = vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptcode;
|
||||
|
||||
if (code & 3 || (code >> 2) >= ARRAY_SIZE(intercept_funcs))
|
||||
switch (vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptcode) {
|
||||
case 0x00:
|
||||
case 0x10:
|
||||
case 0x18:
|
||||
return handle_noop(vcpu);
|
||||
case 0x04:
|
||||
return handle_instruction(vcpu);
|
||||
case 0x08:
|
||||
return handle_prog(vcpu);
|
||||
case 0x14:
|
||||
return handle_external_interrupt(vcpu);
|
||||
case 0x1c:
|
||||
return kvm_s390_handle_wait(vcpu);
|
||||
case 0x20:
|
||||
return handle_validity(vcpu);
|
||||
case 0x28:
|
||||
return handle_stop(vcpu);
|
||||
case 0x38:
|
||||
return handle_partial_execution(vcpu);
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
func = intercept_funcs[code >> 2];
|
||||
if (func)
|
||||
return func(vcpu);
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue