[POWERPC] Fix switch_slb handling of 1T ESID values
Now that we have 1TB segment size support, we need to be using the GET_ESID_1T macro when comparing ESID values for pc, stack, and unmapped_base within switch_slb(). A new helper function called esids_match() contains the logic for deciding when to call GET_ESID and GET_ESID_1T. This fixes a duplicate-slb-entry inspired machine-check exception I was seeing when trying to run java on a power6 partition. Tested on power6 and power5. Signed-off-by: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e7bda183d4
commit
465ccab9eb
1 changed files with 31 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -149,6 +149,35 @@ void slb_vmalloc_update(void)
|
|||
slb_flush_and_rebolt();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Helper function to compare esids. There are four cases to handle.
|
||||
* 1. The system is not 1T segment size capable. Use the GET_ESID compare.
|
||||
* 2. The system is 1T capable, both addresses are < 1T, use the GET_ESID compare.
|
||||
* 3. The system is 1T capable, only one of the two addresses is > 1T. This is not a match.
|
||||
* 4. The system is 1T capable, both addresses are > 1T, use the GET_ESID_1T macro to compare.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline int esids_match(unsigned long addr1, unsigned long addr2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int esid_1t_count;
|
||||
|
||||
/* System is not 1T segment size capable. */
|
||||
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT))
|
||||
return (GET_ESID(addr1) == GET_ESID(addr2));
|
||||
|
||||
esid_1t_count = (((addr1 >> SID_SHIFT_1T) != 0) +
|
||||
((addr2 >> SID_SHIFT_1T) != 0));
|
||||
|
||||
/* both addresses are < 1T */
|
||||
if (esid_1t_count == 0)
|
||||
return (GET_ESID(addr1) == GET_ESID(addr2));
|
||||
|
||||
/* One address < 1T, the other > 1T. Not a match */
|
||||
if (esid_1t_count == 1)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Both addresses are > 1T. */
|
||||
return (GET_ESID_1T(addr1) == GET_ESID_1T(addr2));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Flush all user entries from the segment table of the current processor. */
|
||||
void switch_slb(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -194,15 +223,14 @@ void switch_slb(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
|
|||
return;
|
||||
slb_allocate(pc);
|
||||
|
||||
if (GET_ESID(pc) == GET_ESID(stack))
|
||||
if (esids_match(pc,stack))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_kernel_addr(stack))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
slb_allocate(stack);
|
||||
|
||||
if ((GET_ESID(pc) == GET_ESID(unmapped_base))
|
||||
|| (GET_ESID(stack) == GET_ESID(unmapped_base)))
|
||||
if (esids_match(pc,unmapped_base) || esids_match(stack,unmapped_base))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_kernel_addr(unmapped_base))
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue